Re: Prefix attribute
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> Sat, 13 Jul 2002 00:07:03 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.iptel |
|---|---|
| Organization | dynamicsoft |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Manjunath S Bangalore wrote: >>2) Do the address families in the Prefix attribute need to be >> negotiated in >>the Open exchange? >> > > > I guess you are refering to the different prefix attribute types - > E.164, > Decimal, and PentaDecimal? > Each of these three prefix types has its own attribute type code. The > prefix > attribute types are > currently not included in the OPEN message caps exchange. > > Let me state the problem you mention, correct me if I am wrong. When a > Gateway > advertising routes > using the Trunkgroup address family, for instance, is reporting all the > three > prefix attribute types, but the > TRIP LS processing these gateway routes, has the capability for handling > only > the E.164 prefix type, it > could run into trouble, when it receives Decimal and Pentadecimal > Prefixes. > > I see your point, maybe we need to introduce a PrefixCapability in the > OPEN > message caps. negotiation. > Will write back on this issue after further thought. I think its sufficient to just apply the existing Route type capability to this attribute as well. That is, if a gateway advertises a capability for e.164 and pentadecimal, that means it can support those address families, and also the corresponding two prefix attributes. -Jonathan R. -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Avenue Chief Scientist First Floor dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936 [email protected] FAX: (973) 952-5050 http://www.jdrosen.net PH: (973) 952-5000 http://www.dynamicsoft.com