Re: [IPv6] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-11

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> wrote:
    > What if we start like:

Good.

    > " 3.  Overview

    >    This specification extends [RFC8505] and inherits from [RFC8928] to
    > provide a registration method - called subscription in this case - for
    > anycast and multicast address.  [RFC8505] is agnostic to the routing
    > protocol in which the address may be redistributed.

    >    In classical networks, [RFC8505] may be used for an ND proxy
    > operation as specified in [RFC8929], or redistributed in a full-
    > fledged routing protocol such as EVPN
    > [I-D.thubert-bess-secure-evpn-mac-signaling] or RIFT
    > [I-D.ietf-rift-rift].  The device mobility can be gracefully supported
    > as long has the routers can exchange and make sense of the sequence
    > counter in the TID field of the EARO.  "

    > Works?