Re: [IPv6] New Draft - ICMPv6 Loopback
Tal Mizrahi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.int,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABUE3XmAeR096BP3+Wxf67VWoU=i08vYcQiEMrrF_=Ua3SRwjQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Michael, Please note the following sentence in the security considerations section: "the amplification effect in this case is similar to ICMPv6 error message, and specifically similar to Traceroute." Sending a Loopback causes the exact same amplification as invoking the last packet of Traceroute, i.e., sending a packet with Hop Limit=number of hops to destination. Any amplification attack that can be invoked with Loopback could alternatively be invoked with any packet that has Hop Limit=number of hops to destination. Therefore, Loopback does not introduce a new attack vector. Cheers, Tal. On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 7:59 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Despite what the Security Considerations suggests, this still looks ripe for > use as an amplication attack to me. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area