Re: [IPv6] New Draft - ICMPv6 Loopback

Tal Mizrahi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.int,gmane.ietf.ipv6
Message-ID <CABUE3XmAeR096BP3+Wxf67VWoU=i08vYcQiEMrrF_=Ua3SRwjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Michael,

Please note the following sentence in the security considerations
section: "the amplification effect in this case is similar to ICMPv6
error message, and specifically similar to Traceroute."

Sending a Loopback causes the exact same amplification as invoking the
last packet of Traceroute, i.e., sending a packet with Hop
Limit=number of hops to destination. Any amplification attack that can
be invoked with Loopback could alternatively be invoked with any
packet that has Hop Limit=number of hops to destination. Therefore,
Loopback does not introduce a new attack vector.

Cheers,
Tal.

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 7:59 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Despite what the Security Considerations suggests, this still looks ripe for
> use as an amplication attack to me.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.