Re: [IPv6] New draft: L4 Checksums in SRv6
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.spring,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Tal, Please note that there is an existing draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiao-spring-srv6-checksum/ which attempts to address the problem you found and another one described in the penultimate paragraph of the Introduction section, in a different way not requiring to update RFC 8200. Best Regards, Xiao Min Original From: TalMizrahi <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] <[email protected]>; Date: 2023年08月03日 15:03 Subject: [IPv6] New draft: L4 Checksums in SRv6 Hi, This new draft introduces a proposed update to [RFC8200], which is intended to address compressed segment lists in SRv6 [draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression]. Link to the new draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mizrahi-spring-l4-checksum-srv6/ There was some discussion in the SPRING mailing list about this issue. The current thread is intended to allow a wider discussion that includes the 6MAN working group, and therefore the new draft includes a wider background. Feedback will be welcome. Cheers, Tal. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring