Re: [IPv6] New draft: L4 Checksums in SRv6

If the proposed change is a non-backwards compatible modification right 
down at the bottom of the IP stack, that's a pretty big ask.  Has there 
been any assessment of what this is going to change or break?

Nick

Tony Przygienda wrote on 03/08/2023 17:29:
> well, turns out using a destination address to piggy back some 
> computation semantics and especially changing it in mid-flite is not a 
> great idea. Who knew ...
>
> as to bis'ing STD86 I was quickly thinking "it's not April yet" ...
>
> -- tony
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 9:43 AM <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Tal,
>
>
>     Please note that there is an existing draft:
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiao-spring-srv6-checksum/
>
>     which attempts to address the problem you found and another one
>     described in the penultimate paragraph of the Introduction
>     section, in a different way not requiring to update RFC 8200.
>
>
>     Best Regards,
>
>     Xiao Min
>
>     Original
>     *From: *TalMizrahi <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>;[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>;
>     *Date: *2023年08月03日 15:03
>     *Subject: **[IPv6] New draft: L4 Checksums in SRv6*
>
>     Hi,
>
>     This new draft introduces a proposed update to [RFC8200], which is
>     intended to address compressed segment lists in SRv6
>     [draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression].
>
>     Link to the new draft:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mizrahi-spring-l4-checksum-srv6/
>
>     There was some discussion in the SPRING mailing list about this issue.
>
>     The current thread is intended to allow a wider discussion that
>     includes the 6MAN working group, and therefore the new draft includes
>     a wider background.
>
>     Feedback will be welcome.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Tal.
>
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
>     IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
>     IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring