I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-05.txt

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.i-d-announce,gmane.ietf.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-05.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the IPv6 Maintenance (6MAN) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   Preference for IPv6 ULAs over IPv4 addresses in RFC6724
   Authors: Nick Buraglio
            Tim Chown
            Jeremy Duncan
   Name:    draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-05.txt
   Pages:   14
   Dates:   2023-12-22

Abstract:

   When [RFC6724] was published it defined an address selection
   algorithm along with a default policy table, and noted a number of
   examples where that policy table might benefit from adjustment for
   specific scenarios.  It also noted that it is important for
   implementations to provide a way to change the default policies as
   more experience is gained.  This update draws on several years of
   operational experience to refine RFC 6724 further, with particular
   emphasis on preference for the use of ULA addresses over IPv4
   addresses and the addition of mandatory support for Rule 5.5.  The
   update also demotes the preference for 6to4 addresses.  The changes
   to default behavior improve supportability of common use cases,
   including automatic / unmanaged scenarios.  It is recognized that
   some less common deployment scenarios may require explicit
   configuration or custom changes to achieve desired operational
   parameters.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update/

There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-05

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.