Re: Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)
Alvaro Retana <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.spring,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMMESswF_NnpK7_xk9OXmmocU8P7pne0gmPjCkapXEQVfQA2zQ@mail.gmail.com> |
[Moving this conversation up on your mailbox. :-) ] [Thanks, Robert and Tom for your input!] We want to hear from more of you, including the authors. Even if you already expressed your opinion in a different thread, please chime in here. We will collect feedback until the end of this week. Thanks! Alvaro. On March 28, 2024 at 8:06:18 AM, Alvaro Retana ([email protected]) wrote: Focusing on the C-SID draft, some have suggested requiring the presence of the SRH whenever C-SIDs are used. Please discuss whether that is the desired behavior (or not) -- please be specific when debating the benefits or consequences of either behavior. Please keep the related (but independent) discussion of requiring the SRH whenever SRv6 is used separate. This larger topic may impact several documents and is better handled in a different thread (with 6man and spring included). Thanks! Alvaro -- for spring-chairs _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring