Re: [IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.spring,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tom Herbert <[email protected]> wrote: >> It wouldn't be that weird to have the new SID block in the source >> code, with an override from the command line. No weirder than port >> 23==telnet. >> > Michael, > 23 is well known port number registered with IANA? Is the SID block a > globally reserved address space? My understanding is that it is/will be. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-sids/ https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6man-sids-06.html#name-iana-considerations says: Address Block: 5f00::/16 Name: Segment Routing (SRv6) SIDs RFC: This document I think that this was done via Early Allocation, but I could be wrong. The document is still with the IESG, I guess. I thought it had passed. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 515 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFKBAEBCgA0FiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmYO9MUWHG1jcitpZXRm QHNhbmRlbG1hbi5jYQAKCRCAi3D73dDdZQjZCACMNjYcwmJdxCrg7U2fnDhUlqrK KL3Jyc9zBqcj2Mr6r01AbhxQEav3giNQ2AkkOXixKD0V0RdoymnWpWpR1ky2b/L7 L8UO927/YnN1NeDzqMK/ihh7PKMMZc1AUmBHyoPJ262emQuT/4A4owfFTd78tFoT nGoFnbucrKLVtJuP9/wgxBwQoxdiptHys5XUyWt2/8G3jrMT61/BtGTQk+JAGxfy 5LHfijk0x4q9jA3nLaUXdCdUr5EtQIOGfQb9nUhNioJpy2/1dl1Qv+Gl3K5g3zuN GkF9ImQkMVHQY/fOscFfCOKKx6VCRxdW8NtQKZi9JqNdms4/ds8ir14/FEzB =PeJ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----