I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-07.txt

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.i-d-announce,gmane.ietf.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-07.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the IPv6 Maintenance (6MAN) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   Preference for IPv6 ULAs over IPv4 addresses in RFC6724
   Authors: Nick Buraglio
            Tim Chown
            Jeremy Duncan
   Name:    draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-07.txt
   Pages:   15
   Dates:   2024-04-04

Abstract:

   When RFC 6724 was published it defined an address selection algorithm
   along with a default policy table, and noted a number of examples
   where that policy table might benefit from adjustment for specific
   scenarios.  It also noted that it is important for implementations to
   provide a way to change the default policies as more experience is
   gained.  This update draws on several years of operational experience
   to refine RFC 6724 further, with particular emphasis on preference
   for the use of ULA addresses over IPv4 addresses and the addition of
   mandatory support for Rule 5.5.  The update also demotes the
   preference for 6to4 addresses.  The changes to default behavior
   improve supportability of common use cases, including automatic /
   unmanaged scenarios.  It is recognized that some less common
   deployment scenarios may require explicit configuration or custom
   changes to achieve desired operational parameters.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update/

There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-07

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc6724-update-07

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.