Re: [IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)
Bob Hinden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.spring,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Suresh,
The prefix allocated in draft-ietf-6man-sids is not required to be used. For example, from the Abstract:
This document allocates and makes a dedicated prefix available for SRv6 SIDs.
There is not a MUST be used.
Bob
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 12:44 PM, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:11 PM Adrian Farrel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> If any allocation had been made (early or otherwise), I'd see it here https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml and here https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments/ipv6-unicast-address-assignments.xhtml right?
>
> Correct. There was no early allocation requested. The allocation will
> happen after the approval of draft-ietf-6man-sids. The draft has text
> to update both of the registries you mentioned above.
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring