Re: [IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 3:54 PM Bob Hinden <[email protected]> wrote:

> Suresh,
>
> The prefix allocated in draft-ietf-6man-sids is not required to be used.
>  For example, from the Abstract:
>
>     This document allocates and makes a dedicated prefix available for
> SRv6 SIDs.
>
> There is not a MUST be used.


Yes Bob. It is not mandatory to be used. I was simply responding to
Adrian’s point that he does not see any allocation yet. To the wireshark
dissector point I would think that this prefix would be a good reasonable
default, and that could be overridden by the operator if they run with a
LOC in their own address space.

Thanks
Suresh

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring