[ippm] Re: [IPv6]ICMPv6 Loopback Draft - New Version

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola=40huawei.com-Tr9gZwTxerDR74oF6e/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ippm,gmane.ietf.ipv6
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Tal,
I have read the document and I think that the ICMPv6 Loopback can have relevant diagnostic applications.
I suggest to add a section in the draft to describe application scenarios related to the possible active measurements. In this regard, I would also explain the relation with draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-ext-hdr.
Let me also point out a new draft about on-path active measurements (draft-fioccola-ippm-on-path-active-measurements) and the ICMPv6 Loopback can be an example of how to carry performance data, especially in the case of IOAM.

Regards,

Giuseppe

-----Original Message-----
From: Tal Mizrahi <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 9:26 AM
To: 6man <[email protected]>; IETF IPPM WG <[email protected]>
Subject: [IPv6]ICMPv6 Loopback Draft - New Version

Hi,

We have uploaded a new version of the draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mzbc-ippm-transit-measurement-option/

This version of the draft addresses the amplification issue that was raised about previous versions of the draft.

Please also note that we have a running demo of a utility called ioam-ping which uses ICMPv6 Loopback messages:
https://github.com/talmi/IOAM-Ping-Demo

Comments will be welcome.
Cheers,
Tal.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.