[ippm] Re: [IPv6]ICMPv6 Loopback Draft - New Version

Bikeshed comment, but since from the 6man chat I'm not the only one
confused:

It may be worth picking a different name for this than "loopback".
That term is overloaded and numerous people got confused as to how it
relates to loopback addresses
(eg, an old name for localhost).

What might be a better name I'll leave for the authors as is certainly a
bikeshed.
>From the chat (where not all of these may be serious):

- Bill Fenner.  "mega-echo request
- Éric Vyncke: "mirror request"
- David Lamparter. ICMPv6 Better Echo Request
- Jen Linkova:  Best Ever Echo Request: bEER
Jeremy Duncan how about calling it "closed loop" ? That's like what it's
doing
- Soni Terense - HERE - header echo request [e???]
- me:  FULL_ECHO_REQUEST
-

On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:27 AM Tal Mizrahi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have uploaded a new version of the draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mzbc-ippm-transit-measurement-option/
>
> This version of the draft addresses the amplification issue that was
> raised about previous versions of the draft.
>
> Please also note that we have a running demo of a utility called
> ioam-ping which uses ICMPv6 Loopback messages:
> https://github.com/talmi/IOAM-Ping-Demo
>
> Comments will be welcome.
> Cheers,
> Tal.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email protected]
> Administrative Requests:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]