[manet] Re: [IPv6]IPv6 Address for Ad Hoc Networks

OK, thank you.

Fred

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Hinden <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2024 12:04 PM
> To: Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]>
> Cc: Bob Hinden <[email protected]>; IPv6 List <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IPv6]IPv6 Address for Ad Hoc Networks
> 
> Fred,
> 
> > On Aug 2, 2024, at 8:50 AM, Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Bob, thank you for your comment. I would like to propose a "meet halfway" solution in which
> > the specific prefixes are removed from the main body of the document but may be mentioned
> > in a non-normative appendix - would that work?
> 
> No, I think it's still a distraction.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Bob Hinden <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2024 11:35 AM
> >> To: Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Bob Hinden <[email protected]>; IPv6 List <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [IPv6]IPv6 Address for Ad Hoc Networks
> >>
> >> Fred,
> >>
> >>> On Aug 1, 2024, at 11:40 AM, Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi, this draft has been updated based on feedback from the IETF120 6MAN and MANET working
> >>> group sessions where the work was presented. The updates include:
> >>>
> >>> - Drop support for fec0::/10 - reason: RFC3879 deprecation has rendered this prefix inoperable
> >>> - Use prefix 2001:20::/28 [RFC7343][RFC7401] as "Type-1" Multilink-Local Address (MLA) prefix
> >>> - Use prefix 2001:30::/28 [RFC9374] as "Type-2" MLA prefix
> >>> - Allow future documents to define new MLA types, if necessary
> >>
> >> IMHO, this draft should not specify any specific prefixes.   It should all be “To be assigned”.   Including it now is a distraction to the more
> >> important question.
> >>
> >> I think the question that needs to be answered is:  Is there a real need for Ad Hoc IPv6 addresses?   Focusing now on the details or which
> or
> >> how many prefixes it might use doesn’t address that.
> >>
> >> Bob (w/ no hats)
> >>
> >>
> >>> While MANETs represent a natural basic use case, the IPv6 Ad Hoc network addressing
> >>> scheme applies to all manners of IPv6 networks and not just those that fall within the auspices
> >>> of the MANET working group. The work is therefore in scope for the larger Internet area in
> >>> general the same as RFC5889, but is more specifically targeted for 6MAN due to its exclusive
> >>> focus on IPv6. For full context, please view the IETF120 MANET session presentation beginning
> >>> at the 22minute mark here:
> >>>
> >>> https://play.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/?session=IETF120-MANET-20240726-1630
> >>>
> >>> Please review and comment so that this essential work can move forward.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you - Fred Templin
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2024 12:49 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-templin-6man-mla-19.txt
> >>>
> >>> Internet-Draft draft-templin-6man-mla-19.txt is now available.
> >>>
> >>>  Title:   IPv6 Addresses for Ad Hoc Networks
> >>>  Author:  Fred L. Templin
> >>>  Name:    draft-templin-6man-mla-19.txt
> >>>  Pages:   13
> >>>  Dates:   2024-08-01
> >>>
> >>> Abstract:
> >>>
> >>>  Ad Hoc networks often present a challenging environment for IPv6
> >>>  addressing due to the indeterminant neighborhood properties of their
> >>>  interfaces.  IPv6 nodes must assign IPv6 addresses to their interface
> >>>  connections to Ad Hoc networks that are locally unique but must not
> >>>  be propagated to other networks.  IPv6 nodes must therefore be able
> >>>  to assign self-generated addresses to their interfaces when there are
> >>>  no IPv6 Internetworking routers present that can coordinate topology-
> >>>  relative IPv6 addresses or prefixes.  This document specifies IPv6
> >>>  address types that can be assigned to Ad Hoc network interfaces.
> >>>
> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-6man-mla/
> >>>
> >>> There is also an HTMLized version available at:
> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-templin-6man-mla-19
> >>>
> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-templin-6man-mla-19
> >>>
> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> >>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> I-D-Announce mailing list -- [email protected]
> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> Administrative Requests:
> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >

_______________________________________________
manet mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]