[Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)

Tom Herbert <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:57:35 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.int,gmane.ietf.ipv6
Message-ID <CALx6S370OtCnjfL92d-jnJQmxF3t9kKf9SA7EDk1ygtoLXsVzw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024, 4:46 PM Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 28-Sep-24 02:58, Templin (US), Fred L wrote:
>
> ...
> > No one that I know of has suggested obsoleting RFC2675 - my documents do
> not say "obsoletes" (nor even "updates").
>
> Just to wrap that up: I seem to remember the RFC2675 extension header
> being mentioned as a candidate for deprecation during some discussion of
> HbH extensions in recent years.
>

Brian,

I think it falls under the category of "things in protocols some people
want to deprecate because they are unaware of deployed use cases". Like:

- jumbograms are used by Linux and some device offloads
- some applications are using the full twenty bits of entropy in the flow
label
- there are valid use cases and deployment of IP fragmentation

Tom


>     Brian
>

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]