[Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)
Tom Herbert <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:57:35 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.int,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALx6S370OtCnjfL92d-jnJQmxF3t9kKf9SA7EDk1ygtoLXsVzw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024, 4:46 PM Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28-Sep-24 02:58, Templin (US), Fred L wrote: > > ... > > No one that I know of has suggested obsoleting RFC2675 - my documents do > not say "obsoletes" (nor even "updates"). > > Just to wrap that up: I seem to remember the RFC2675 extension header > being mentioned as a candidate for deprecation during some discussion of > HbH extensions in recent years. > Brian, I think it falls under the category of "things in protocols some people want to deprecate because they are unaware of deployed use cases". Like: - jumbograms are used by Linux and some device offloads - some applications are using the full twenty bits of entropy in the flow label - there are valid use cases and deployment of IP fragmentation Tom > Brian > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]