[spring] Re: Second WG Last Call: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-s ecurity-14 (Ends 2026-06-02)
Nick Buraglio <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:50:39 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.spring,gmane.ietf.ipv6 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACMsEX8P0QZ9FMQwp3BCWaWY3cRD2jCEFRTUecHdfEf-Me1BkQ@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============3351536843709238082== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c4e53806550a381d" --000000000000c4e53806550a381d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Apologies for the long tail. We have just published -15 which I think incorporates all of the agreed-upon above suggestions. nb On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 11:42=E2=80=AFAM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.= com> wrote: > Thank you to everyone who has made comments and provided reviews! > > While there is strong support to move this draft forward, there are still > a couple of open items that need to be addressed. Even though the period > has ended and the comments have died down for now, we will wait until the > open items are addressed before officially closing the WGLC and sending > this draft to the IESG. > > Alvaro. > > On May 18, 2026 at 3:44:57=E2=80=AFPM, Alvaro Retana via Datatracker ( > [email protected]) wrote: > > This message starts a Second WG Last Call for: > draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14 > > This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-06-02 > > Abstract: > SRv6 is a traffic engineering, encapsulation and steering mechanism > utilizing IPv6 addresses to identify segments in a pre-defined > policy. This document discusses security considerations in SRv6 > networks, including the potential threats and the possible mitigation > methods. The document does not define any new security protocols or > extensions to existing protocols. > > File can be retrieved from: > > Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the > publication of this document by replying to this email keeping > [email protected] in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions > to > resolve them are highly appreciated. > > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the > provisions > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can b= e > found at [3]. > > Thank you. > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-spring-srv6-securi= ty-14 > > --000000000000c4e53806550a381d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Apologies for the long tail. We have just published=C2=A0-= 15 which I think incorporates=C2=A0all of the agreed-upon above suggestions= .<div><br></div><div>nb</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir= =3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 11:42=E2=80=AFAM Alva= ro Retana <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">a= [email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_qu= ote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,20= 4);padding-left:1ex"> <div id=3D"m_9140723964923799772m_8971220949970096026bloop_customfont" = style=3D"font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px;margin:0px">Thank you t= o everyone who has made comments and provided reviews!<br></div><div id=3D"= m_9140723964923799772m_8971220949970096026bloop_customfont" style=3D"font-f= amily:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px;margin:0px"><br></div><div id=3D"m_914= 0723964923799772m_8971220949970096026bloop_customfont" style=3D"font-family= :Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px;margin:0px">While there is strong support t= o move this draft forward, there are still a couple of open items that need= to be addressed.=C2=A0Even though the period has ended and the comments ha= ve died down for now, we will wait until the open items are addressed befor= e officially closing the WGLC and sending this draft to the IESG.</div><div= id=3D"m_9140723964923799772m_8971220949970096026bloop_customfont" style=3D= "font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px;margin:0px"><br></div><div id= =3D"m_9140723964923799772m_8971220949970096026bloop_customfont" style=3D"fo= nt-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px;margin:0px">Alvaro.</div> <br><p>O= n May 18, 2026 at 3:44:57=E2=80=AFPM, Alvaro Retana via Datatracker (<a hre= f=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>) wrote= :</p> <blockquote type=3D"cite"><span><div><div></div><div>This message sta= rts a Second WG Last Call for: <br>draft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14 <br> <br>This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-06-02 <br> <br>Abstract: <br> SRv6 is a traffic engineering, encapsulation and steering mechanism <br> utilizing IPv6 addresses to identify segments in a pre-defined <br> policy. This document discusses security considerations in SRv6 <br> networks, including the potential threats and the possible mitigatio= n <br> methods. The document does not define any new security protocols or <br> extensions to existing protocols. <br> <br>File can be retrieved from: <br> <br>Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with th= e <br>publication of this document by replying to this email keeping <br><a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a= > in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to <br>resolve them are highly appreciated. <br> <br>Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectu= al <br>Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1]. <br>Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the prov= isions <br>of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. <br>Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can= be <br>found at [3]. <br> <br>Thank you. <br> <br>[1] <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/" target=3D"_blan= k">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/</a> <br>[2] <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/" target=3D"_blan= k">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/</a> <br>[3] <a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/" target=3D"_bl= ank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/</a> <br> <br>The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: <br><a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-secu= rity/" target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring= -srv6-security/</a> <br> <br>There is also an HTML version available at: <br><a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-secur= ity-14.html" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-s= pring-srv6-security-14.html</a> <br> <br>A diff from the previous version is available at: <br><a href=3D"https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-sprin= g-srv6-security-14" target=3D"_blank">https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?= url2=3Ddraft-ietf-spring-srv6-security-14</a> <br></div></div></span></blockquote> <div id=3D"m_9140723964923799772m_8971= 220949970096026bloop_sign_1781195824183745024"></div> </blockquote></div> --000000000000c4e53806550a381d-- --===============3351536843709238082== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18Kc3ByaW5nIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdCAtLSBzcHJpbmdAaWV0Zi5vcmcKVG8gdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUgc2VuZCBhbiBlbWFp bCB0byBzcHJpbmctbGVhdmVAaWV0Zi5vcmcK --===============3351536843709238082==--