Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-05: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I support the various DISCUSS points concerning the security
> considerations.
>
> I note that the remaining authors have made their IPR statements, so that
> discussion is moot.
>
> I share some of the discomfort concerning the shepherd report. I'm
> willing to accept that the shepherd is in the rough, but it would be nice
> to have stronger evidence of that, perhaps in the form of an opinion from
> the other chair. To quote a wise area director: I leave it to the
> responsible AD to do the right thing, whatever that might be.


Ben,

Thanks.    The formal minutes from IETF 98 on IS-IS include:

"- Intro, Adminastriva, Document Status - Chris Hopps (See slides)
    Alia Atlas: Some discussions surrounding using
                 IS-IS for link-bundles.
     Chris Hopps: Draft has been WG document for months and
            months. Why are there questions now?
     Alia: Requires further discussion. Need to notify
           RTG WG and OSPF WG.
     Les: What is the progression of this document. Past
          WG last call since June. What is timeline?
     Alia: Wasn't completely aware of timeline and will
           do another AD review. Assuming no major concerns
           during IETF last call it could go to IESG telechat
           in May.
     Peter Lothberg: This is holding up required IS-IS protocol
           deployment.
"

This is a cleaned up version of what I recall being said - which included
Chris
Hopps, the other ISIS WG Chair, clearly stating that the draft had WG
consensus.
I regret that that wasn't captured in the formal minutes, but it should be
at the start
of the recording.

Regards,
Alia

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg