Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07

I support publication of this document.

For those of you who have followed this draft over the years, you will know that I have expressed concerns as to whether this is needed and/or is an appropriate way of achieving the desired behaviors. 
However, it is clear that this is seen as useful by operators, and I think with the addition of other use cases (mobility, spine-leaf, LDP-IGP sync), handling of TE, security discussion, and more complete deployment discussion this draft does provide a significant and useful mechanism and I am happy to support it.

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isis-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian
> Hopps
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 2:43 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07
> 
> 
> The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on
> 
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/
> 
> which will last an extended 3 weeks to allow for IETF100.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg