Re: [OSPF] early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG

+1

S


On 24/01/2018 23:27, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
>
> Hi Alia,
>
> +1 on keeping FRR work in RTGWG ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
> *From: *rtgwg <[email protected]> on behalf of Alia Atlas 
> <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 09:22
> *To: *<[email protected]>, OSPF List <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *RTGWG <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG
>
> I am working on the initial charter for the LSR WG, which will combine 
> the
>
> OSPF and ISIS WGs.  At this time, I do not see moving the fast-reroute 
> work
>
> from RTGWG, but I am willing to hear opinions.
>
> In general, feedback on what areas should be the initial focus or 
> specific
>
> concerns on scoping would be useful. My basic plan is for a broad 
> charter focused
>
> on maintenance, usage scenarios, and extensions - much as OSPF and 
> ISIS are
>
> chartered today.
>
> I would like to have this on the February 8 IESG telechat, so rapid 
> feedback and reviews
>
> of the proposed charter when it is sent out would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alia
>
> _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list 
> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf