Re: Potential agenda for SF meeting

Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> Also, I sent some comments on the list about two weeks ago, no replies
> yet.
> 
> The biggest thing I'd like to have w.g. discuss is whether cryptographic
> parts of iTrace could be optional in the implementations -- even specified
> separately.
> 
> Those seem to have a lot of weight in the spec and make implementing seem
> like a lot more complex task; I'm not sure if the tradeoffs are worth
> that.
> 
The thought has always been that the PK stuff, at least, was optional to implement.

Please put together something for the SF meeting, and I'll put you on the agenda.


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Marcus Leech                             Mail:   Dept 8M70, MS 012, FITZ
Advisor                                  Phone: (ESN) 393-9145  +1 613 763 9145
Security Architecture and Planning       Fax:   (ESN) 393-9435  +1 613 763 9435
Nortel Networks                          [email protected]
-----------------Expressed opinions are my own, not my employer's------