Re: a potential security hole?

OKABE Nobuo <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:28:54 +0900 (JST)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.kink
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: Ken Hornstein <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: a potential security hole? 
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:35:26 -0500

> 
> > >    First, Bob updates a bogus pair (FQDN: BAD, IP address: IPb)
> > >    of his naming system. Then, he initiates KINK for BAD@REALM.
> > >    KINK on A starts KINK message. X that is a intermediate box
> > >    between A and B can impersonate B because X can understand
> > >    a ticket for BAD@REALM.
> >
> >I assume here that "X" is the attaker, not Bob?
> >Otherwise I'm really confused because why would
> >Bob update his naming to point at "BAD"? Are
> >Bob and X somehow in collusion?
> 
> I'm a bit confused as well ... because if X know's B's key, then for
> the purposes of Kerberos, X _is_ B, and that is something Kerberos
> explicitly does _not_ deal with.

Again, sorry for my poor contets.
I tried to explain the attack in my another mail
that replied to Michael. Please see it.

---- nobuo