Re: KINK should referenece to IKEv2?

> >I think the main 2401bis feature is multiple SAs between two
> >destinations.  Kink actually already has this capability.  It may be
> >that by changing the text slightly and removing the requirement on
> >selecting which SA to use if multiple SAs exist, we can get most
> >2401bis functionality.
> 
> 2401 already requires support for multiple SAs between a pair of 
> peers. What 2401bis adds is a requirement to support these multiple 
> SAs to have identical selectors, and where we are not just replacing 
> one SA with a successor.

2401bis requires a system complies 2401bis to handle multiple SAs
with same selector, but different "classifier" between same two nodes.
it means that it requires a key management protocol to establish
multiple SAs somehow.  i think that current kink specification can do that.