#22

> #22 [*] Kerberos PFS (section 6.8)
> 
> 	Sec 6.8: "Kerberos in general does not provide PFS so it is somewhat 
> 	questionable whether a system which is heavily relying on Kerberos 
> 	benefits from PFS."  First, that sounds like it might be Security 
> 	Considerations material.  Second, I don't follow; explain please?
> 	(Ken Raeburn)

I agree with Ken about the first.  the document has to describe this
issue in the security consideration even if the thing is not issue,
at least, the document says that is questionable.

I don't understand what Ken meant.  what don't you follow ?