Re: KINK issue list rev.2

On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 02:22, Shoichi Sakane wrote:

> I don't think KINK will have minor change often, and I don't think the
> minor version will bring worth things to KINK.  so I feel that I want
> to remove the minor version from KINK specification.

I fine with this is others are fine with this too.

		Mike

> 
> However, if we will leave it, it is policy matter to process a message
> with a higher minor version.  so we have to describe like below:
> 	if a endpoint receives a message with a higher major version
> 	number, it MUST drop the message and SHOULD send a KINK_ERROR
> 	with KINK_INVMIN.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUAQgOL6rMsDAj/Eq++AQLSagP+KOFWGpJyK2wi9WXHh+ZIURDtuZgSQPDL
lVEioEkS52Qg2Abq0LJt4bWZ3i8K0qOU7+TdARyx8NWk9Xj71L5m53r+rKWFiLvO
HM2AAA2f76t7l2aLXnScvyCl3kaJQFqtMgRT03pKKzzrMUhFgcuhBRtE2vJrSbSm
U0m4SMiicV8=
=kBmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----