Re: #22
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Tue, 08 Feb 2005 22:57:46 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Thomas <[email protected]> writes: Michael> In fact, I'd be willing to wager that KINK is the _only_ Michael> Kerberized application that has any notion of PFS right Michael> now which really illustrates why if people think that PFS Michael> is important, it ought to be done up a level. You'd lose the wager; the GSSAPI support for ssh does PFS. I do agree PFS should be supported at a higher level in Kerberos though; that is on krb-wg's agenda to enable. --Sam