#16 [*] EPOCH (section 5.1.2)
"KAMADA Ken'ichi" <[email protected]> Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:43:48 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050210154348XQ%[email protected]> |
> #16 [*] EPOCH (section 5.1.2) > > Perhaps you need a description of the time stamp? I recall there > being such a description in draft-housley-binarytime-xx. > (Sam Hartman) The current draft specifies it as "the standard posix four octet time stamp". Is describing in KINK preferred to referring POSIX? FWIW, the EPOCH field is only used for DPD and the format of it is not important, as far as the same value is not reused within a short period. -- KAMADA Ken'ichi <[email protected]>