Re: #29 [*](2401bis) Rekeying (section 4.4.1)
Bill Sommerfeld <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:23:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1108689779.25320.25.camel@thunk> |
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 02:07, Kazunori Miyazawa wrote: > Normally a KINK implementation which rekeys existing security associations will > start to rekey the security association at the soft lifetime. In order to avoid > synchronization with similar implementations, KINK initiators MUST randomly pick > a rekeying time between the soft lifetime and the hard lifetime minus the amount > of time it would take to go through a full retransmission time cycle, Tretrans. > The soft lifetime SHOULD be set at least twice Tretrans before the hard lifetime. Another way to phrase this: "the soft lifetime must be randomized to avoid synchronization.." - Bill