Re: #31 [*] behavior on KINK_ERROR

At Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:06:16 +0900,
Kazunori Miyazawa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> But please let me confirm.
> 
> Does the first item mean that the initiator which receives a message
> with KINK_OK can ignore KINK_ERROR payload when the message includes it?

I meant _the_ KINK_ERROR whose value is KINK_OK.
If another KINK_ERROR were included (I think it is not allowed),
it should not be ignored.
# BTW, KINK_OK should not be allowed to be sent in the first place...

> What are other error codes in the third item? Does it mean the error coeds
> except for KINK_OK and KINK_BADQMVERS?

Yes.

-- 
KAMADA Ken'ichi <[email protected]>