Re: clean #37 and #5 and introduce #45
Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:35:26 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I believe that #45 can be solved at least by adding more clarification related to the KE handling, the non-optimistic proposal handling and the nonce handling. the descriptions are slightly dispersed in the current document. > Hi. I don't believe that <20050204170451BM%[email protected]> > actually gives a good answer to which key is used on each side. > > I understand section 8's purpose is to answer this issue, but I did > not find it clear. I believe that section 8 is going to need to > change to specify use of the kcrypto prf. > > I think that once this change is made I should either say that the > result is clear or explain exactly what I think is missing. I suspect > I may want some text copied in from the IKE RFC. >