Re: #42 [-] Wording
Michael Thomas <[email protected]> Thu, 12 May 2005 14:53:59 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Organization | Cisco Systems |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-13y0wTouyunIahWo+yD4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 02:18, KAMADA Ken'ichi wrote: > # I know such a subtle English matter is beyond me... >=20 > At Wed, 11 May 2005 17:28:58 +0900, > Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> wrote: > >=20 > > >>#42 [-] Wording > > >>(waiting a revision) > > >> > > >> Section 4.3, discussing attributes, mixes singular and plural > > >> indications. > >=20 > > If Ken indicated the following sentence; > >=20 > > The initiator MUST check to see if the optimistic payload was select= ed by > > comparing all transforms and attributes which MUST be identical from > > the initiator's optimistic proposal with the lone exception of > > LIFE_KILOBYTES and LIFE_SECONDS. > >=20 > > then I think that the original text in the section 4.3 is nearly correc= t. > > because a single proposal can contain multiple transforms, for example, > > using both ESP and AH. and regardless of that, a transform can contain > > multiple attributes. >=20 > I agree that this is just a wording issue. > How about this: >=20 > The initiator MUST check to see if the optimistic payload was > selected by comparing all transforms and attributes which MUST be > identical from those in the initiator's optimistic proposal with the l= one > ~~~~~~~~ > exception of LIFE_KILOBYTES and LIFE_SECONDS. Each of these > ~~~~ > attributes MAY be set to a lower value by the respondent and still > expect optimistic keying, but MUST NOT be set to a higher value which > MUST generate an error. Good except: s/lone exception/exceptions I'm not sure it's an error though: what does IKE do in this case? >=20 >=20 > > >> The word "lone" appears to be popular with the au= thor, > > >> too. :-) (Ken Raeburn) Not any more... I've moved on :-)=20 Mike --=-13y0wTouyunIahWo+yD4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUAQoPQd7MsDAj/Eq++AQLrOAP/aRdeeojNQwqhJ8JWtzjBw2pmQdaK/P30 Z4xYrmFvwQp6N3ppDAq6UKmcDX9M+PwDX4VEpYUzO+vbWgD7b31QoRy/GAASxlep BoxNso+7k1Rv60sSJOIFY24xffbWdspSrjZyvNGHRwb0Zq6k8D9QcuAp5I7uUjo3 JDeb0+oYrVg= =iL48 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-13y0wTouyunIahWo+yD4--