Re: request to progress draft-ietf-kink-kink-10

Hi,

I believe that both of these are editorial changes, so we
can apply them as an RFC Editor Note.  So, no, I do not
believe you need to update the draft at this time.  We
just need to remember these changes and make sure they
get inserted.

If we get the draft pushed back to us from the IESG
then we can insert them ourselves, but right now we
are "done".

Thank you,

-derek

Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi derek,
>
>> The two editorial issues are listed below.
>
> Should I resubmit the new draft -11 after fixing two issues ?
>
>> ISSUES
>> ----------
>> 
>> 3.5.  Reporting Errors
>> 
>>    If the initiator detects an error in a received replay, there is no
>> 
>> should be
>> 
>>    If the initiator detects an error in a received reply, there is no
>> 
>> (replay -> reply)
>> 
>> -----------
>> 
>> 5.3.  Identification Payloads
>> 
>> Where is the source of these IDs?
>
> The source is [IPDOI].  So it should change into the following text.
>
> 	KINK restricts the ID types that are defined by section
> 	4.6.2.1 of [IPDOI], to the following values:
>
>
>

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       [email protected]             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant