Re: Last Call: 'Kerberized Internet Negotiation of Keys (KINK)' to Proposed Standard (fwd)
Nicolas Williams <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:20:13 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg,gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:24:13PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "KAMADA" == KAMADA Ken'ichi <[email protected]> writes: > > > KAMADA> The KINK_ENCRYPT payload is tied with AP-REQ (or AP-REP) > KAMADA> with the Cksum field. I thought it is enough to prevent > KAMADA> reflection. Isn't it? > > I believe so. Yes, I had not noticed that all KINK messages have an AP-REQ, AP-REP or KRB-ERROR. Nico --