[Jeffrey Hutzelman] Followup on KINK last call
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:41:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Jeff points out that we also need to specify the key to use. It is presumably the session key because that's the only key involved. ] Some discussion related to the last call of draft-ietf-kink-kink-10.txt was copied to the Kerberos WG list, but I'm afraid part of it may have missed both the IETF and IESG lists. In particular... - This comment appears to have gone unaddressed in -11: > I did notice that section 4.2.7 KINK_ENCRYPT does not specify what key is > used, only that it "is encrypted using the encryption algorithm specified > by the etype of the session key"