Moving forward on KINK--deadline for action

Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:51:20 -0500 (EST)
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.kink
Message-ID <[email protected]>


Several people have expressed interest in helping with the KINK
effort.  That's great to hear.  It looks like we have or are close to
having sufficient interest to do adequate review.  We also clearly
have interest in implementing the results of the working group.

Assuming fairly dedicated effort, I suspect that we can get the
document into shape within six months and get IESG approval shortly
after that.

I'd like to ask the working group chairs to prepare a new set of
milestones for getting from our current position to a completed
document.  The milestones should include identifying the issues we're
going to fix, coming to consensus on fixes and confirming adequate
review of the result.

Along with the set of milestones, I'llother  need the names of specific
reviewers from the chairs.  I'll need a qualified reviewer for
Kerberos and for IPsec (2401 and IKE).


I expect the results to work will with Kerberos clarifications and
draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis.

I will have my specific comments on the kink draft to the working
group by January 20; the working group has already received the
general areas I'm concerned about.

In order to set a concrete deadline, I am requesting the milestones
and reviewers from the chairs by February 7, 2005.  I'm picking the
deadline because it is the first scheduling deadline for IETf 62.  If
someone has a preference for another deadline speak up now.  Otherwise
I'll treat February 7 as a hard deadline: if the milestones and
reviewers are submitted by then, we'll continue, but otherwise, the
working group will conclude.

I'd also suggest that KINK consider meeting at IETF 62.  If we can get
enough of the people together it will be useful to discuss the issues
and hopefully come to quick resolution.  Naturally, the decision of
whether to meet is up to the chairs.


Sam Hartman,

Security Area Director