Moving forward on KINK--deadline for action
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:51:20 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Several people have expressed interest in helping with the KINK effort. That's great to hear. It looks like we have or are close to having sufficient interest to do adequate review. We also clearly have interest in implementing the results of the working group. Assuming fairly dedicated effort, I suspect that we can get the document into shape within six months and get IESG approval shortly after that. I'd like to ask the working group chairs to prepare a new set of milestones for getting from our current position to a completed document. The milestones should include identifying the issues we're going to fix, coming to consensus on fixes and confirming adequate review of the result. Along with the set of milestones, I'llother need the names of specific reviewers from the chairs. I'll need a qualified reviewer for Kerberos and for IPsec (2401 and IKE). I expect the results to work will with Kerberos clarifications and draft-ietf-ipsec-rfc2401bis. I will have my specific comments on the kink draft to the working group by January 20; the working group has already received the general areas I'm concerned about. In order to set a concrete deadline, I am requesting the milestones and reviewers from the chairs by February 7, 2005. I'm picking the deadline because it is the first scheduling deadline for IETf 62. If someone has a preference for another deadline speak up now. Otherwise I'll treat February 7 as a hard deadline: if the milestones and reviewers are submitted by then, we'll continue, but otherwise, the working group will conclude. I'd also suggest that KINK consider meeting at IETF 62. If we can get enough of the people together it will be useful to discuss the issues and hopefully come to quick resolution. Naturally, the decision of whether to meet is up to the chairs. Sam Hartman, Security Area Director