Re: who will edit the draft ?
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:45:02 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.kink |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]> writes: > WG chairs, > > I am also interested in the KINK protocol, and have a experience > to discuss the specification, to implement it in our team. And I > am developping a IKE daemon in the KAME project. So I can be reviewer > from the KINK and IPsec point of view. Good to know. Thank you for volunteering. At this time Mike Thomas has agreed to continue to edit the draft, so unless he becomes unresponsive I see no reason immediately to appoint a new draft editor. [snip] > And we have to make a milestone ASAP. Here is from "Goals and Milestones" > in the WG page, > > Done Reach Consensus on requirements document > Done Meet at San Diego IETF to review drafts > Jan 01 Reach Consensus on base draft protocol > Feb 01 Conduct WG last call on base draft prototol > Mar 01 Begin Interoperability bakeoffs > Aug 01 Document interoperability results. > Make decision to recycle or move forward > > The items would be: > > Feb 14 Submit draft kink-07 with editorial modifications. > Mar 01 Review the issue of current draft, kink-06. > Apr 01 Reach Consensus on draft. > May 01 Resubmit revised draft as Proposed Standard. > Aug 01 Begin Interoperability bakeoffs. > Sep 01 Document interoperability results. > > If the chair has had the set already, I am sorry for my meddling, > but at least I have not seen yet. Thease are just my opinion, > any comment welcome. That would be help for the chairs. The dates are Month / Year, not Month / Day. So I think you probably mean Feb 05, Mar 05, ... Based on the existing set of issues I do not believe that your suggestions are reasonable -- they are way too aggresive. I really do not believe that we'll reach consensus by April. I think we have way too many issues. Perhaps a better proposal for milestones are: Mar 05 Review issues with kink-06 Mar 05 Submit kink-07 Jun 05 Reach consensus on necessary changes Jul 05 Submit kink-08 Aug 05 WGLC Sep 05 Submit draft to IESG Jan 06 Begin Interop bakeoffs Feb 06 Document interop results. Even this schedule is extremely agrressive, but IMHO actually achievable. I don't think we can get concensus on all the open issues and make it past the IESG before Paris. -derek -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 [email protected] www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant