Re: KINK should referenece to IKEv2?

Kazunori Miyazawa <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:30:47 +0900

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.kink
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Shoichi Sakane wrote:
> In my opinion from reading the minutes at the IETF50 minneapolis,
> there is no strict reason to change the referenece from IKEv1 to IKEv2
> because the ISAKMP payload in the KINK is just used to carry a set of
> IPsec parameters, and Notification Payloads.
> 

We should have a consensus whether we will discuss KINK based on rfc2401bis
or rfc2401.

--
Kazunori Miyazawa