Re: KINK should referenece to IKEv2?

From: Shoichi Sakane <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: KINK should referenece to IKEv2?
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:20:17 +0900

> so we can have four choices while researching the difference between
> 2401bis and RFC2401 from KINK requirement of view:
> 
> 	1. make a standard base on both rfc2401 and IKEv1.
> 	2. make a standard base on both rfc2401 and IKEv2.
> 	3. make a standard base on both 2401bis and IKEv1.
> 	4. make a standard base on both 2401bis and IKEv2.
> 
> I would like #1 then we proceed to #4.

I agree with your choise (i.e. #4) if we can keep new milestones
which the chairs proposed today.

My point is how stable 2401bis is.

----- nobuo