Re: KINK should referenece to IKEv2?

> Speaking as an AD, if 2401bis is approved by IETF 62, Kink will be
> based on 2401bis.  If not, then it depends on where 2401bis is, where
> Kink is, and how fast things are moving.

I dont understand why KINK will be based on 2401bis when 2401bis
is approved by IETF62.  There are lots of platforms based on 2401.
KINK should be based on 2401 in order to deploy it.  If the market
will not choice 2401bis and if a kink implementation based on 2401bis
does not work on a platform based on 2401, then KINK will not deploy.

it is not easy to know how difference between 2401bis and 2401,
and it is not easy to know if a key management daemon based on
2401bis will work on a platform based on 2401.  so I said in previous
mail that we should make kink based on 2401 then make kink based on
2401bis.  kink header has a version field.