Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-00.txt
"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hows much effort do we really need to put into this? Everyone knows it needs to happen (and should have already). 1 day/key was before the Amazon Cloud. I'd be curious what it costs in Cloud time now, but I wouldn't hold up the draft for it. On Feb 5, 2012, at 6:51 PM, Tom Yu wrote: > This version is mostly editorial cleanup. I also added updated > information about DES cracking performance -- it seems that one day > average per key was commercially available by 2008. I think the > abstract could get shorter; any suggestions about what to cut? > > Open items -- what other algorithms do we need to deprecate? I thought 3-des supposed to be EOL last year, but I guess that was only 2TDEA. Any checksum algorithms that are past date? I wouldn't hold up this draft for other algorithms, but it's a good question. If other stuff should get similar treatment we shouldn't be so slow about writing a similar draft. ------------------------------------------------------ The opinions expressed in this message are mine, not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government. [email protected], or [email protected] _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg