Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-00.txt

Tom Yu <[email protected]> writes:

> "Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Hows much effort do we really need to put into this?  Everyone knows it needs to happen (and should have already).
>
> I think it's close to done.  (I noticed a word omission in the
> abstract after I submitted it, and maybe more minor editing needs
> doing.)  I'm not sure where we left the document state before.  Did we
> do a WGLC on it?

Of course, now that I've submitted the draft, I've found a number of
small typos, and an occurrence of "DES-MD5" that really should be
"RSA-MD5".  Fixed in my working copy.  Also improved some citations
and shortened the Abstract a little.

>> I thought 3-des supposed to be EOL last year, but I guess that was only 2TDEA.  Any checksum algorithms that are past date?
>
> I think the current document deprecates some of them already (though
> mostly some bare unkeyed checksums).

I also removed the section about "Other old enctypes".
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg