Re: Agenda Krb-WG Session ietf 83
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> writes: > Hasnaa> If there would be a session, I would like to know the > Hasnaa> possibility of having a slot for presenting the draft > > Hasnaa> (Authentication in Wireless Mesh Networks Through Kerberos > Hasnaa> Tickets <draft-moustafa-krb-wg-mesh-nw-02> ). > > > We've not seen a lot of interest in this draft from parties other than > the authors. I think we'd need to see significant interest from other > parties before presenting this draft again would make sense. > > I'd like to hear comments from other WG participants who would like to > spend time on this topic. I'm somewhat confused after browsing the document. It is targeted as an informational document, it contains a problem statement, and then a "solution proposal extending the Kerberos authentication model". a) Are there any changes required for any Kerberos implementer to support this document? b) Is the "solution proposal" more than just a proposal, i.e., is it something that can be implemented at all? If the answer to a) and b) is yes, I believe it would be useful to review the document in this WG. The document appears to allocate a new KDCOptions flag. I cannot find any registration policy for the KDCOption namespace in RFC 4120. If this document moves forward, I think that problem needs to be resolved first. /Simon _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg