Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-01.txt
Sam Hartman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Yu <[email protected]> writes: Tom> Implementations call it ARCFOUR-HMAC in various places for Tom> trademark reasons, as I recall. (Though skimming RFC 4757 Tom> reminds me that we might also want to deprecate rc4-hmac-exp Tom> (24) -- "export strength" RC4 -- as weak.) I'd be willing to Tom> skip that to get the document out sooner. Do people have Tom> strong opinions about naming it RC4 versus ARCFOUR? I feel strongly that we should use whatever name is registered with IANA which is presumably rc4. I support deprecating the export strength RC4 enctype. _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg