Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-02.txt

Michiko Short <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.krb-wg
Message-ID <5674376E76F88641AD3748A64F09969707A523A6@TK5EX14MBXC244.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
+1

Windows XP is under extended support until 2014 and Windows Server 2003 until 2015, so we can expect that customers will continue to use until at least then.

Also since I am catching up on my email I have been reading all the threads at once and it seems that if we restrict this draft to RFC to DES it would go faster. I agree we should message that RC4 is next and we can even start a RC4 draft to make it obvious to people outside the working group.   

Thanks,
Michiko Short | Program Manager | Windows Security & Identity



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nico Williams
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:57 PM
To: Russ Allbery
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-02.txt

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:
> Note that RC4-HMAC is the only non-DES enctype available if one needs 
> interoperability with Windows XP systems, which is still an issue for 
> a lot of sites.  By contrast, there's much less operational need for 
> either DES or RC4-HMAC-EXP these days.
>
> Sites that move from DES to RC4-HMAC are almost certainly much better 
> off, so I would be hesitant to give both of those enctypes the same 
> status as long as Windows XP is still a significant going concern.

+1

But we could warn that we intend to deprecate RC4-HMAC next.

Nico
--
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.