Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-02.txt
"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Yu <[email protected]> writes: > > Tom> Simo Sorce <[email protected]> writes: >>> I am for narrowing the scope to DES and getting this standard out >>> ASAP. It has been bounced enough, and adding more discussion to >>> deprecate other algorithms would only delay it, further. >>> >>> Meanwhile DES is really insecure these days and we ought to >>> deprecate it officially so that all vendors wake up and start >>> moving off of it for real. > > > As a process point, I believe that once we conclude our discussion here > about what if anything to say about RC4, we will not be slowed down > regardless of whether we include RC4. I think that coming to consensus > to remove RC4 references is likely as difficult as coming to consensus > to keep it. > > > So, my opinion as someone familiar with IETF process is that we should > do what is right: it will take about the same time either way. > > --Sam OK, sold! ------------------------------------------------------ The opinions expressed in this message are mine, not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government. [email protected], or [email protected] _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg