Re: Kx509bis proposals

Still intend to do it.  Still intend to wait until the current informational draft is finalized before doing it.

Russ submitted a new (hopefully final) draft of the existing one, but either the rfc editor hasn't been notified, or hasn't taken action.

(There was a nice FAQ-like web page that described what the rfc-editor notification needed to cover for an individual submission, but I can't seem to find it again.)

On Mar 25, 2012, at 12:04 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:

> 
> 
> hi folks.
> I just wanted to check in on the effort to come up with a draft to
> address the following charter item:
> 
>  * Prepare a standards-track protocol to solve the use cases addressed
>      by draft-hotz-kx509-01 including new support for digital
>      signatures.
> 
> 
> I'm wondering how the effort to come up with a proposal for that is
> going? I think that after we get the IANA document off to the IESG, we'd
> be in a good position to work on something of about that size.
> _______________________________________________
> ietf-krb-wg mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
[email protected], or [email protected]

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg