Re: des-die-die-die and adding IANA registry status columns
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:33:22 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> writes: Stephen> Folks, Stephen> What's the conclusion here? Does die-die-die need a change Stephen> for this or not? Here's what I wrote to Stephen in another message that was not copied to the WG: OK, here's where we stand on the IANA thing. The registry in question doesn't currently record status. The WG did not sign up to adding status columns when we wrote des-die-die-die although perhaps we should have. A couple of people spoke out in favor of adding status and deprecating things in the registry if it was easy. Tom pointed out that if we were going to do that we probably ought to consider the status of everything else already in that registry and set it accurately. So, current status seems to be that no one really objects to updating the registry if it's easy, no one really strongly supports it. There's some doubt about whether it's easy or whether it would end up raising the status of other ciphersuites or macs. I'm not seeing a strong consensus for change, but no significant opposition. So, do you want to make a call on what you'd like us to do here? _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg