Re: A proposal from Adrian on the des deprecation registry

> > I would rather not replace deprecated enctypes' names with "deprecated".
> 
> Oh, dear, I missed that.  I agree strongly -- it's the enctype that's
> deprecated not the number, and the enctype still has a name.  We have
> enough problems with people using made-up names for enctypes without
> removing the real names from the registry.

Hi.

This is a perfectly valid view.

To be clear, you are deprecating the use of the mechanism, but if someone wants to use it, you want to make sure there is a clear code point available so that they can indicate which deprecated mechanism they are using.

Cheers,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg