Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509

>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> writes:


Hi.  I believe that this issue has been discussion in the Kerberos
working group and we asked the author to document the existing KX509
protocol and publish that so we'd have a historical record of what is
done today.  It's likely we'll do work in this space in the future but
it's our desire that work be informed by an existing historical record
and the current draft will help us with that.

So, with my chair hat on, I believe this has already been discussed in
Kerberos and we support publication. Which is to say, no conflict here.

    Stephen> I'll take silence as meaning that nobody thinks that
    Stephen> there's a conflict. If someone thinks there is a conflict
    Stephen> let me, the list, or the wg chairs know. In due course,
    Stephen> I'll be doing my own evaluation as well of course, as will
    Stephen> other IESG members.

    Stephen> Thanks, Stephen.

    Stephen> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hotz-kx509-04 [2]
    Stephen> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5742

    Stephen> _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg
    Stephen> mailing list [email protected]
    Stephen> https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix