Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-12.txt
Simo Sorce <[email protected]> Sun, 03 Jun 2012 08:48:44 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.krb-wg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 12:23 +0200, Leif Johansson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/30/2012 07:13 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 13:00 -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > >> I'd like to call the working group's attention to the new text > >> surrounding RFc 2119 language. In particular in this draft, > >> MUST features in the information model MUST be representable in > >> schema *and* MUST be supported by all implementations of the > >> information model. That last was intended by Leif but was new to > >> me. > > > > Thanks for bringing this up Sam. > > > > > > I am reading the doc now and I have a question as to why we have a > > MUST on the syntax of attributes like principalNotUsedBefore. > > > > It says it MUST use "Internet Date/Time Format from [RFC3339]" > > > > This is problematic as LDAP uses generalizedTime defined in > > RFC4517. It is a representation of ISO8061 just like RFC3339, but a > > *different* representation. > > > > Trying to force all implementations to use the RFC3339 definition > > seem wrong. What implementation, today, uses RFC3339 ? > > > > I would rather suggest that the document does not mandate the > > specific representation discussed in RFC3339 but allow any ISO8601 > > based representation. > > > > If it is felt that one representation really needs to be chosen > > then I'd ask to use the generalizedTime representation as defined > > by RFC4517 instead of the one in RFC3339. > > > So this was a WG decision at the time. Maybe we should say "Internet > Date/Time format MUST be based on ISO8601 and SHOULD be based on either > RFC4517 or RFC3339". That would probably work. > In practice the or doesn't result in interop issues > since it is unlikely that an LDAP client be used to talk to a SOAP > server :-) Indeed. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg