Re: KDC model and atomicity (was Re: Add. comments on Kdc model, WAS[Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-12.txt])

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Specifically I object to any requirement, particularly any implied 
> requirement, that a KDC support atomic operations on principal 
> records.  We have never before had such a requirement, and to add
> it now for a controversial feature (a DoS, for goodness' sake)
> is... not acceptable.

I hadn't thought of this aspect. FTR I agree with your objection.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/U9+cACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnc6qACfYJYgOrI3X+++ELQINPCS2IfA
hNcAnR8trOERKxvXWvGi9YMD9Xa39upf
=2U/P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg